Value isn't real unless people can see it.

ThoughtForm, Inc.
News
  • What isn’t digital transformation?
  • The next evolution of the knowledge office
  • Project management for maximum humanity
  • Designing the future of men’s health
  • The power of business design
Menu
Close
  • Home
  • Case Studies
  • Our Difference
    • Our Difference Overview
    • Building Collective Insight
    • Making Value Visible
  • Solution Areas
    • Overview
    • Change Management
    • Innovation System Development
    • Digital Transformation
    • Go-to-Market Planning
    • Brand Definition
    • Organizational Learning
  • Wayfinding
  • Process
  • Partnerships
    • SDLC Partners
    • Cylumena
    • Become a Partner
  • Conversations
    • Blog
    • White Papers
    • Webinars
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Our Team
    • Jobs

Blog

Comparing internal consulting funding models

Share on:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

May 11 2017 ThoughtForm Staff

Last week, my colleague Lindsay Quinter and I had the pleasure of attending and presenting at the Association of Internal Management Consultant‘s Annual Conference. This intimate, 3-day gathering in Orlando provided a chance for internal consultants to share best practices and wrestle with common issues around team structure, operating model, project prioritization, and funding model.

Not sure what an “internal consultant” is?  Much like an external consultant, an internal consultant works in an advisory capacity to teams across their organization to create strategic vision and planning, lead change, improve the performance of the company, and tackle major initiatives. They bring the same specialized management consulting expertise that an external consultant brings, but with the added knowledge and organizational expertise of the company they are embedded in.

One of the sessions at this year’s conference was a comparison of funding models for internal consultants. Internal consulting groups can be funded by their companies in a variety of ways, including corporate funding, allocations from business units that use the consultants services, and even for fee-for -service. Each option has its pros and cons and the session was a lively discussion of the various options and befits associated with each. Lindsay has put together her notes from the session into a concise visual explanation. Caution: these are only from our notes from one session.

We probably got a few things wrong…but a tool like this is great way to present information for structured conversations and refinement. So, take a look and if you agree or disagree–drop us a line and let us know how you see funding for internal consulting groups differently.

If you want to know more about our session, The role of visual explanations in strategy development, we’ll be doing encore presentation webinar on Wednesday May 17.

  • < Previous
  • View All
  • Next >
  • Blog
  • White Papers
  • Webinars

Let’s connect.

Give us your email and we’ll send you ThoughtForm’s quarterly newsletter. That way you can stay up to date with how we’re helping many different teams shape go-to-market approaches, build organizational readiness, and launch big initiatives.

If you'd like to chat, drop us a line here and we'll get back to you shortly

Connect
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Social Media Disclaimer

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2022 ThoughtForm, Inc. All rights reserved.